Next stop: Detroit.  The 2009 Final Four will commence this Saturday at Ford Field in Motown.  Can the Spartans and Wildcats kick the Huskies and Tar Heels to the curb?

It is a great weekend for sports fans with the Final Four and the culmination of the college basketball season next Monday in Detroit for the national championship. It is clear that it is not the teams the start the season hot, but the ones that get hot when it really matters – March and April!

Many things happen over the course of a long season. Some teams play great basketball in December and January, only to break down from injuries or run out of steam down the stretch. Cincinnati is a good example, winning 10 of 12 games to start the season. Overrated (and overvalued), the Bearcats finished the season on a 1-6 SU/ATS run. Two years ago Clemson started 17-0, then failed to even make the Big Dance after a 4-10 SU, 5-9 ATS run.

Kansas may have won the title last year, but four years ago it was a very different story: The Jayhawks started 20-1, only to go 3-6 straight up and 1-8 against the spread the last nine games. They never made it to the Final Four because of a 64-63 loss to Bucknell as a 13½-point favorite.

Other times an easy early season schedule, youth, bad coaching, untimely injuries, bad luck, poor team chemistry or a combination of these can cut down a potentially great team. Youth and a loss of its best players certainly fell Florida the last two years after winning back-to-back titles.

Wake Forest had a disastrous finish to what had been a fine season, bowing out early in the ACC tourney to Maryland as a 6-point favorite, then getting upset by Cleveland State as 8-point chalk in the first Big Dance contest. This is nothing new. Last year No. 2 seed Georgetown took itself out of the tournament, blowing a 46-29 lead by trying to stall against Davidson with far too much time left.

Two years ago Wisconsin was a No. 2 seed, but suffered a key late season loss in 6-11 Brian Butch, their leading rebounder and third-leading scorer. They weren't the same group, getting smacked by Ohio State in the Big 10 tourney and an upset loss to UNLV in the Big Dance.

It is very easy for sports bettors to look into trends to try and predict the future. Trends can be helpful if there are reasons to support it. For example, from a betting perspective, what stands out about the last seven Finals Fours

YEAR TEAMS . . . . . Score Line
2008 Kansas. . . . . . 84 . 158
2008 North Carolina. . 66 . . 3

2008 UCLA. . . . . . . 63 . 135
2008 Memphis . . . . . 78 . . 3

2007 Georgetown. . . . 60 . . 1
2007 Ohio St . . . . . 67 . 130

2007 UCLA. . . . . . . 66 . 131
2007 Florida . . . . . 76 . . 3

2006 George Mason. . . 58 . 132
2006 Florida . . . . . 73 . -6

2006 LSU . . . . . . . 45 . -2
2006 UCLA. . . . . . . 59 . 123

2005 L
ouisville. . . . 57 . 144
2005 Illiniois . . . . 72 . -3

2005 Michigan St . . . 71 . 153
2005 North Carolina. . 87 . -2

2004 
Georgia Tech. . . 67 . 139
2004 Oklahoma St . . . 65 . -4

2004 UConn . . . . . . 79 . -2
2004 Duke. . . . . . . 78 . 144

2003 
Marquette . . . . 61 . -4½
2003 Kansas. . . . . . 94 . 153½ 

2003 Syracuse. . . . . 95 . 153
2003 Texas . . . . . . 84 . -3

2002 
Indiana . . . . . 73 . 134
2002 Oklahoma. . . . . 64 . 6½

2002 Maryland. . . . . 97 . 168
2002 Kansas. . . . . . 88 . -1½

What stands out is that it has been the Day of the Dog. The underdog is 9-4 against the number, with eight dogs winning straight up, including Ohio State last season. In addition, the games have gone 8-6 Over the total, although the Under is 4-2 the last three years. You can even make an argument that this would be the right time of the college hoops' season to take a shot with the dog on the money-line.  However, this is where one needs patience, because trends can also be a fool's paradise. The last four years the favorites are 5-3 ATS. So if you had used that dog strategy the last two years you would have gone 3-5.

If you go back to the previous three Final Fours before that survey, 1999-01, we find Duke topping Maryland 95-84, Arizona blowing out Michigan State 80-61, Michigan State beating Wisconsin 53-41, Florida topping North Carolina 71-59, UConn beating Ohio State 64-58 and Duke surviving Michigan State 68-62. What stands out is that the favorite won and covered in five of six, for a hefty 5-1 spread record.

Even looking at totals, a similar pattern emerges. The last seven years the Over has gone 8-6 in the Final Four. The three years before that the Under prevailed at a 5-1 clip. That's just 11-9 under the last ten years. All of a sudden, those who look solely at trends as the key to the sports betting kingdom are stuck at close to a .500 winning percentage ATS.

For the record, going back the last 14 years, there have been 16 Unders and 12 Overs in the Final Four, with 15 dogs covering while 13 favorites have gotten the money. Again, trends are worth examining, but there needs to be reasons behind them if you're serious about putting down hard earned money on a side. Perhaps the most significant stat that stands out is that 12 of the 15 dogs that covered ended up winning the game outright, which shows how competitive and relatively evenly matched the games become when teams get this far in the season.